Saddl website · page review

Five pages, rewritten in place

Each page keeps its live header, footer, tracking and approved sections. New content sits between them. Open the proposed page next to the live one, then confirm the points listed for each page.

01

About

/about/ · about 380 → 1,440 words, including the existing timeline

What changed

  • Hero, timeline photos and store list kept exactly as live.
  • New “Saddl at a glance”: one sentence describing Saddl plus six facts.
  • One “What it taught us” line added to each timeline chapter.
  • New sections: why the name, four lessons from Saddl’s own stores, four commitments, who Saddl is right for, a Noon Core proof strip, a five-question FAQ.
  • Header button now reads “Request an account audit”; the closing button goes to the organic audit page instead of the paid landing page.

Please confirm

  • Assumption: the “Why Saddl?” story. Nothing was published on the website or LinkedIn. Confirm with Aslam, or the section is deleted before go-live.
  • The S2C bottle figures (AED 37 / 31 / 5 / 27 of every AED 100), taken from Aslam’s LinkedIn post of 25 Sep.
  • Quote: “Every function started as a problem that cost me money before it became a feature.” (same source, 10 Sep).
  • The one-sentence description of Saddl, which will be reused across the site.

02

Marketplace Management

/marketplace-management/ · about 330 → 1,200 words

What changed

  • Short answer: “What is marketplace management?”
  • Responsibilities table: the same split as the Services page.
  • An illustrative decision flow: signal → decision → owner → follow-through.
  • Comparison with in-house team, PPC tool and advertising-only agency. No prices and no named providers.
  • Amazon UAE and Noon Core proof strips, and a six-question FAQ. Title now targets “marketplace management services”.

Please confirm

  • That the published UAE case-study figures may be repeated on service pages.
  • Comparison wording: these are general patterns, not claims about named competitors.

03

Noon Marketplace Management

/noon-marketplace-management/ · about 350 → 1,030 words

What changed

  • Short answer: “How does Saddl manage Noon?”
  • Amazon vs Noon Core vs Noon Minutes table: how changes are made, what each channel is for, metrics, reconciliation.
  • Noon Core and Noon Minutes proof, including the Minutes revenue decline (−12.9%), so the proof stays honest.
  • Six-question FAQ, including “What is a good ROAS on Noon?” (break-even ROAS method).

Please confirm

  • That Noon can be sold as a standalone engagement (FAQ says yes).
  • That Noon KSA is in scope (FAQ says yes, linking to the Saudi page).
  • That showing the Minutes revenue decline is acceptable.

04

Account Review → Account Audit

/account-review/ (URL unchanged) · about 340 → 760 words, excluding the form

What changed

  • Named “account audit” throughout. The FAQ explains it is the same as the 48-hour diagnostic used in ads.
  • Short answer: “What is a marketplace account audit?”
  • Two published audit findings (12.5× → 3.5–4.6× ROAS; stockout mistaken for an ad problem).
  • Fit section and the eight-question FAQ, brought over from the paid landing page.
  • Form fields, tracking attributes and scripts unchanged. Only the heading and button labels changed. The fallback line no longer says “Online requests are currently unavailable”.

Please confirm

  • Button label: “Request an account audit” replaces “Request my free audit”. The body still says “no cost, no commitment”.
  • The AED 1,000 onboarding-fee line is kept as live.

05

UAE Marketplace Management

/uae-marketplace-management/ · about 390 → 860 words

What changed

  • Facts strip: Dubai base, UAE channels, Saddl’s own UAE stores, how changes are made, first step.
  • The “Observed work” paragraph is replaced by a three-channel results table from the UAE case study, including the flat account-level result.
  • Six-question FAQ (Amazon and Noon together, where Saddl is based, Noon Minutes, Saudi Arabia, agencies, the audit).

Please confirm

  • Showing the account-level result (revenue −3.2%, revenue after advertising flat), as published in the case study.